Find the content that's quietly failing.
Health check scans your library for content that's unlinked to any skill or getting low engagement, the stuff that's technically published but not actually doing its job.
Trusted by scaling L&D teams
One request. A clear list of what to look at.
No need to manually cross-reference engagement stats against your skills library.
Request a health check
An admin asks Thirst AI to scan the library for content that needs attention.
See what's flagged
Unlinked content and low-engagement content are listed separately, with the numbers behind each.
Fix, tag, or retire
The admin decides what to tag, update, or archive, nothing changes automatically.
Not everything published is actually working
A library can look healthy from the outside while quietly accumulating content nobody finds or finishes. Health check surfaces that, so clean-up becomes a regular five-minute task instead of an annual project.
- Flags content unlinked to any skill, not just low engagement
- Uses real completion and view data, not guesswork
- Never changes or removes anything automatically
- ✅ 4 pieces of content unlinked to any skill since publication
- ✅ 2 pieces with under 5% completion in the last 90 days
- 💡 One flagged item is a recent upload, may just need more time
Built for admins, keeps the library honest, not just published
Learners
Fewer dead ends, less chance of landing on content that isn't actually useful.
Managers
More confidence that what you're assigning is content people can actually find and finish.
Admins
A regular, five-minute way to catch content clean-up before it becomes a backlog.
"People aren't just being trained anymore — they're taking ownership of their learning. They log into Thirst, explore what's available, and even share what they know with others."
Common questions
Does this fix or remove anything automatically? +
No, it only flags. Every decision to tag, edit, or archive stays with the admin.
What counts as 'low engagement'? +
Completion and view rates well below your library's typical average over a set period, currently 90 days.
Can I run this on a schedule? +
Currently it's on-demand; ask your account team about scheduled reporting options.
Does it check for duplicate content too? +
That's covered by a separate feature, Content freshness, rather than Health check.
Catch content problems before they pile up
A regular check-in, not a once-a-year audit project.
